In many settlement negotiations, the two sides narrow their disagreement to a small gap in their positions, a gap so small it pales in comparison to the total amount of money being discussed. This happens often in divorce mediation, where clients threaten to blow up a multi-million dollar divorce settlement over the last $5,000 disagreement. Why would anyone do that? Why would either side let everything fall apart over an amount they’ll obviously spend on attorneys if they continue fighting?
The reason is that it is seldom about the money, and it is often about what the money represents. Those last few dollars in a negotiation often represent winning or losing; they represent the potential for acknowledgment or just another rejection; they represent all the giving in that got us here thus far, and the loss that goes with it; and in a divorce those last few dollars potentially represent the true end of the relationship and the last chance to hang on.
David broke the cycle by helping his client see that regardless of what the final number was (within reason), the value of peace and a finalized divorce was something he had to weigh by his own standard of value. This is a value only clients can choose, and is often overlooked because it doesn’t have a legal or financial value. Only a client can decide if the price of peace is more important to them than the cost of the fight.